Makana Kennedy
Uganda’s Foreign Minister, Henry Oryem Okello, recently stirred controversy with his statement suggesting that only an “idiot” could die of hunger in Uganda, citing the abundance of food in the country. His remarks have ignited a debate on the state of food security and inequality within Uganda.
Okello’s comment came in the context of President Museveni’s assertion in 2023 that Uganda is so wealthy that even a fool could become rich in the country. While these statements may have been intended to highlight Uganda’s potential and resources, they have instead drawn attention to the stark realities faced by many Ugandans, particularly in terms of access to food and economic opportunities.
Despite Uganda’s agricultural potential and natural resources, the country continues to grapple with food insecurity and poverty. According to the World Food Programme, approximately 1.3 million Ugandans face acute food insecurity, with factors such as conflict, climate change, and economic instability exacerbating the situation.
Okello’s assertion that there is “enough food” in Uganda overlooks the complex challenges that contribute to food insecurity, including distribution inequalities, inadequate infrastructure, and limited access to markets for smallholder farmers. While Uganda may produce an abundance of certain crops, such as maize and bananas, issues such as post-harvest losses and lack of storage facilities often result in food wastage and shortages in certain regions.
Furthermore, disparities in wealth and access to resources mean that not all Ugandans have equal opportunities to benefit from the country’s supposed wealth. Rural communities, in particular, face significant barriers to economic prosperity, with limited access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities.
Okello’s statement has been met with criticism from various quarters, with many pointing out the insensitivity and ignorance inherent in his remarks. Advocates for food security and social justice emphasize the need for comprehensive policies and interventions that address the root causes of hunger and poverty in Uganda, including equitable distribution of resources, investment in agriculture, and support for vulnerable populations.
In response to the backlash, Okello has attempted to clarify his comments, stating that he was highlighting Uganda’s potential rather than dismissing the challenges faced by some of its citizens. However, his remarks serve as a reminder of the importance of mindful and responsible rhetoric, particularly from government officials, in addressing issues of national concern.
Moving forward, it is essential for Uganda’s government to prioritize inclusive and sustainable development strategies that prioritize the needs of all its citizens, particularly the most vulnerable. By acknowledging the realities of food insecurity and working towards equitable solutions, Uganda can truly harness its wealth and resources for the benefit of all its people.
